In Dead Space, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $99 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 34% cheaper – $189.95 vs $289.00
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Dead Space – $1.08 vs $1.58/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Dead Space
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 4% faster in Dead Space – 182 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Dead Space
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
175 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
89%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
65%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
68%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
