In Dead Space, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i9-11900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $259 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 58% cheaper – $189.95 vs $449.00
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Dead Space – $1.09 vs $2.49/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Dead Space
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 3% faster in Dead Space – 180 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Dead Space
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
174 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
92%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
42%
Value, $/FPS
$2.49/FPS
44%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $539.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
