In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-3220T is slower than the Core i7-9700K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $10 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 5% cheaper – $189.95 vs $199.99
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 25% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 130 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 16% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $1.53 vs $1.82/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
104 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
77%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
84%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
