In Remnant II, the Core i3-3220T is slightly faster than the Core i7-8700T and it's also a better value for money, as it's $85 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 2% faster in Remnant II – 207 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Remnant II
- Up to 31% cheaper – $189.95 vs $275.00
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Remnant II – $0.91 vs $1.36/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Remnant II
Core i7-8700T
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
Remnant II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-8700T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
202 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-8700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-8700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
