In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i7-720QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3220T
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Sep 03, 2012 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-720QM
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 210 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-720QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
203 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
96%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-720QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-720QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $364.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGAG1 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
