In Atomfall, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i7-6700 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $82 more expensive!
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-6700
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jul 01, 2015 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 43% cheaper – $107.98 vs $189.95
- Up to 43% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Atomfall – $0.51 vs $1.00/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
90%
Price, $
$189.95
56%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
51%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$107.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
