In Atomfall, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i7-4765T. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $309 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 62% cheaper – $189.95 vs $498.95
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $1.01 vs $2.50/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 199 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 months and 28 days newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 months and 28 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-4765T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
94%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
38%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
40%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
