In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220T is faster than the Core i7-13700 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $180 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 49% cheaper – $189.95 vs $369.99
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.94 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-13700
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-13700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$369.99
51%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
