In Atomfall, the Core i3-3220T is slower than the Core i7-11700K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $159 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 46% cheaper – $189.95 vs $349.00
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall – $1.02 vs $1.53/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-11700K
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-11700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
186 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
81%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-11700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i7-11700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
