In F1 24, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 12% faster in F1 24 – 160 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in F1 24
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 27% cheaper – $139.00 vs $189.95
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in F1 24 – $0.86 vs $1.32/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in F1 24
F1 24 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
143 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
107 FPS
89%
Price, $
$189.95
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
65%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
160 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
120 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
