In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220T is faster than the Core i5-9400. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 27% cheaper – $139.00 vs $189.95
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.79 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
84%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
175 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
86%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
