In Deathloop, the Core i3-3220T is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-13400
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-13400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
223 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
97%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-13400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-13400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
