In Atomfall, the Core i3-3220T is slower than the Core i5-12400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
82%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
