In Deathloop, the Core i3-3220T is slightly faster than the Core i3-10100. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $40 more expensive!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 21% cheaper – $149.94 vs $189.95
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 20% better value in Deathloop – $0.68 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 20% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
80%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
