In Atomfall, the Core i3-3220 is slightly slower than the Xeon X5570. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3220
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Sep 03, 2012 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5570
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Xeon X5570: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
99%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Xeon X5570 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Xeon X5570 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X5570
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5570 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $1,386.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1366 |
55W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
