Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2985 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $91.98 vs $343.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.55 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3220 - 189 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |