In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220 is faster than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $276 cheaper!
Core i3-3220
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $91.98 vs $367.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.46 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 55 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
172 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
87%
Price, $
$367.99
24%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7800X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $449.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
