In Atomfall, the Core i3-3220 is slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $102 cheaper!
Core i3-3220
- Up to 53% cheaper – $91.98 vs $194.00
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Atomfall – $0.48 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 250 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
76%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
47%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
62%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
