In Deathloop, the Core i3-3220 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $257 cheaper!
Core i3-3220
- Up to 74% cheaper – $91.98 vs $348.52
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Deathloop – $0.41 vs $1.44/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$348.52
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
28%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
