The Core i3-3220 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-7920X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $75.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-3220
- Up to 52% cheaper – $70.00 vs $145.00
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 55 vs 140 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-7920X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-7920X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-7920X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
18%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3220 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-X |
55 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 16.5 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
