In Dead Space, the Core i3-3220 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $347 cheaper!
Core i3-3220
- Up to 79% cheaper – $91.98 vs $438.99
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Dead Space – $0.52 vs $2.37/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Dead Space
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space – 185 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
174 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
86%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
185 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.99
20%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
