In Deathloop, the Core i3-3220 is slightly slower than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3220
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Sep 03, 2012 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Core i7-820QM
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $546.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
