In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220 is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3220
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Sep 03, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
199 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
97%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
