In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i3-3220 is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $57 cheaper!
Core i3-3220
- Up to 38% cheaper – $91.98 vs $149.35
- Up to 38% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Ghost of Tsushima – $0.86 vs $1.03/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Ghost of Tsushima
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 55 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 37% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 145 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
106 FPS
73%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
65%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
145 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
109 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
61%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
83%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
