In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jun 01, 2012 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1156 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
