In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 17 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X
- Up to 37% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 9 9950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9950X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 9 9950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 9 9950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9950X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM5 |
17W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
