In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3217U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 8700G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Ryzen 7 8700G
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 7 8700G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
119 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$284.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 7 8700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 7 8700G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700G Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM5 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon 780M |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
