In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slower than the Ryzen 7 3800X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 17 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 3800X
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 219 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 7 3800X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 3800X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$339.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 7 3800X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 7 3800X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 3800X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3800X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $399.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
