In Deathloop, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 7600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 5 7600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 5 7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 5 7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $229.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM5 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
