In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 2600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Apr 19, 2018 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
