The Core i3-3217U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core Ultra 9 285
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3217U vs Core Ultra 9 285
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
177
73%
Min 1% FPS
123
74%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 29th, 2025
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$520
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 29th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3217U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 29th, 2025 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1851 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Arrow Lake-S |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR5 @ 6400 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
