Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-9900 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-3217U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-9900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
177
86%
Min 1% FPS
123
87%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$291
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $423.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
