In F1 23, the Core i3-3217U is slower than the Core i9-7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 17 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7900X
- Up to 22% faster in F1 23 – 259 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in F1 23
- Is 5 years and 24 days newer – Jun 26, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 5 years and 24 days newer
F1 23 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
21%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
14 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7900X Jun 26th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA2066 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
