In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 17 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
Core i9-14900KS
- Up to 36% faster in Atomfall – 250 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 36% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Mar 14, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-14900KS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$588.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-14900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-14900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KS Mar 14th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Mar 14th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $689.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
