The Core i3-3217U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 17 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-13900KS
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
177
73%
Min 1% FPS
123
75%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
165
100%
Price, $
$741.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3217U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
17 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 6.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
