In Dead Space, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Core i9-11900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 3% faster in Dead Space – 180 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Dead Space
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-11900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-11900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-11900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $513.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
