In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Core i7-6700T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-6700T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1151 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
