In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Jun 01, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i7-620M
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
