Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-3820 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-3217U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 17 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-3820
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
177
96%
Min 1% FPS
123
97%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-3820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-3820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
30%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $305.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
