In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slightly slower than the Core i5-4690K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 17 vs 88 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
Core i5-4690K
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years newer – Jun 02, 2014 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 2 years newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-4690K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-4690K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-4690K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4690K Jun 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $243.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1150 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 88 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
