In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slower than the Core i5-14500. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
Core i5-14500
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 236 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-14500: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-14500
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-14500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-14500 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14500
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14500 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $232.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
