In Atomfall, the Core i3-3217U is slower than the Core i5-11600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $213.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
