In Deathloop, the Core i3-3210 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 5700X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $36 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 18% cheaper – $159.00 vs $195.00
- Up to 18% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Deathloop – $0.71 vs $0.85/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700X
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
98%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
84%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
55W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
