In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-3210 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3210
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Is 12 years and 12 days newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 12 years and 12 days newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
