In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3210 is faster than the Core Ultra 7 265 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $190 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 54% cheaper – $159.00 vs $348.52
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.79 vs $2.05/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Is 12 years and 6 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 12 years and 6 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$348.52
45%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
