In Atomfall, the Core i3-3210 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 235. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $115 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 42% cheaper – $159.00 vs $273.98
- Up to 42% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall – $0.84 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core Ultra 5 235
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 6 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 12 years and 6 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 5 235: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
77%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.98
58%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
75%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 5 235 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core Ultra 5 235 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 235 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $257.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
