In Atomfall, the Core i3-3210 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $41 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 20% cheaper – $159.00 vs $199.99
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 9% better value in Atomfall – $0.84 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
87%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
91%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
