In Control, the Core i3-3210 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $87 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Up to 35% cheaper – $159.00 vs $245.68
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Control – $0.64 vs $0.98/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
246 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245.68
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
