In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-3210 is slightly faster than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3210
- Up to 1% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 105 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jan 01, 2013 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $546.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
