In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3210 is slightly slower than the Core i7-740QM. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $31 cheaper!
Core i3-3210
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Jan 01, 2013 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 16% cheaper – $159.00 vs $189.95
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 12% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.79 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i7-740QM
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 209 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-740QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
97%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Core i7-740QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
88%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-740QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3210 vs Core i7-740QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-740QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-740QM Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $378.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
